Rugby in Sweden and Europe

Något av ett dråpslag att ordförande Maria Vargö tar time-out och kanske inte kommer tillbaka efter årsmötet i mars. Det pratas om ”personliga skäl” och, om så är fallet, det måste vi respektera. Styrelsearbetet är krävande, tidsomfattande och icke-arvoderat. De som befinner sig mitt uppe i karriären och dessutom har familjeåtaganden kan upptäcka att de inte riktigt har tid att offra flera hundra timmar om året åt denna fritidssysselsättning.

Det har dock antytts att den röra som den avsatta styrelsen lämnade efter sig visat sig vara mera omfattande än man hade väntat sig. Maria och Pasi var visserligen med även i den styrelsen men så vitt jag vet var den avgående ordföranden som styrde med järnhand och med ett betydande inslag av hemlighetsmakeri.

Ytligt sett har den nya styrelsen skött sig på ett bra sätt. Informationen från SRF har förbättrats avsevärt och landslagsprestationerna har också varit något bättre. Men informationen från landslagen har varit bristfällig och det finns flera exempel på administrativa missar som inneburit att det saknats full uppsättning spelare till landskamper eller turneringar. Nästa inga redogörelser för dessa speltillfällen, inga riktiga matchrapporter, inga diskussioner om hur lagen kan utvecklas inför en hårdnande konkurrens. Mänga landslag har haft 5 – 6 ledare med sig, men uppenbarligen ingen som kan få ihop några meningar om vad de håller på med.

Det viskas att det spenderats alldeles för mycket pengar på dessa landslag, men jag har inte sett en redogörelse för dessa utgifter. Det är dock uppenbart att sporten i Sverige inte är tillräckligt stark för att motivera 7 – 8 landslag, vilket jag och andra påpekat åtskilliga gånger.

Landslag som spelade under 2018 var följande:

D U18 7s; D Senior 7s, 15s; H U18 7s, 15s; H U20 15s, H Senior 7s, 15s.

D U18 7s: 2018 fanns bara en Europeisk mästerskapsnivå/ungdoms-OS . Sverige slog ett par nybörjare, BÖR INTE SPELA PÅ DENNA NIVÅ. Möjligtvis som Swedish Vikings om självfinansierat.

D Senior 7s: kom 3:a på Trophynivå efter nedflyttning från GP. Har inte utvecklats det senaste året, glappet till GP ökar. Måste förbättra sina sjumanna färdigheter för att kunna hävda sig.

D Senior 15s: spelat två vänskapsmatcher men deltar inte i nystartade Europeiska Mästerskap (Spanien, Nederländerna, Ryssland, Tyskland) och Trophy (Finland, Schweiz, Tjeckien) Varför inte? Sverige bör kunna slå 4 – 5 av ovannämnda länder. Bör ligga lågt i år, få flera lag och seriematcher i Sverige och anmäla sig till Trophy 2020.

H U18 7s: 2018 fanns bara en Europeisk mästerskapsnivå/ungdoms-OS. Sverige långt ifrån de bästa lagen, bör kanske återvända till Trophy-nivå i år.

H U18 15s: deltar inte sedan några år tillbaka i Europeiska U18 15s. Antagligen tillräckligt starka för att delta på nytt efter några bra vänskapsmatcher Men vi måste få flera spelare och matcher i Sverige.

H U20 15s: spelade sina två första matcher i år med hyfsade resultat. Bör fortsätta, kanske som Swedish U20 Vikings.

H Senior 7s: gjorde hyfsat ifrån sig på GP-nivå, hade stannat kvar om inte Polen hade bjudit på tre årsturneringar. Några bra yngre spelare, men administrationen missköttes. Dags för förnyelse, laget kan inte längre styras från utlandet.

H Senior 15s: två segrar på nivå 3 i Europa, avgörande match mot Ukraina i maj. Ingen chans till uppflyttning om inte ledningen och hälften av spelarna bytts ut,

Möjligtvis kunde detta förslag spara några kronor på landslagsnivån, just nu glider vi för mycket utan att ställa tuffa krav.

Ytterligare en fundering kring SRF´s nuvarande styrning. Den gamla styrelsen utsåg Neil Johnson till Generalsekreterare, den enda arvoderade befattningen. Han har fortsatt i år men det verkar som om GS-funktionen helt övertagits av Pasi. Det har antytts att Neil letar efter en uppgift åt styrelsen, dock utan att helt lyckas.  En fråga som kanske borde ventileras inför årsmötet.

SRF har i år hållit ett större antal möten och rest riket runt för att informera och lyssna på rugbysverige. Men ser vi på den löpande verksamheten går den från katastrof till katastrof. Det spelas mindre än 100 matcher om året mot över 300 för några år sedan. Man kan inte enbart skylla på SRF, men ett krismöte, kanske i anslutning till årsmötet, verkar mer och mer angeläget.

I wrote some time ago about going to the Scotland – South Africa match at Murrayfield where I was underwhelmed by the total (expensive) experience of the day´s entertainment.

Interesting to compare with attending the HSBC World Sevens in Cape Town for a weekend in early December. The venue, the Green Point stadium built for the soccer world cup a few years ago. An excellent modern stadium seating over 60,000 in a bowl with good viewing for everyone. Easy to get into and out of, with a large number of food and drink outlets and huge toilet areas for both men and women. Fancy dress everywhere of course and everyone out to enjoy themselves. Crowds ranging from 20,000 to 60,000 for the whole of the 20 hours of the tournament with the largest numbers assembling for the electric atmosphere when the Blixbocke play. (For all the hype, Hong Kong and Dubai are nothing like full until the last few hours of the final day, and their stadia are much smaller.)

Having taken the time and expense to get there, the Exiles team of myself and Allan Mabon with wives had decided to lash out and buy special tickets which gave us the best seats and unlimited food and drink for the two days. Every few hours when a couple of perhaps less interesting games were on all we had to do was go down to a huge area under the stands where excellent hot food was continuously served and enormous bars served a wide range of beverages. And you could still watch the games on large screens. All included in the ticket price which was 2,000:- SEK per day. The seats were spacious, right on the centre line.

Allan, who is teetotal, missed out a bit perhaps, while others in the group made determined efforts to get full value for their tickets. An extremely civilized way to attend a sevens tournament.

The tournament was, of course, superb. Rugby enthusiasts like myself are biased but I still maintain that these top class seven´s players are the finest athletes on the planet. The teams belonging to the top rank are improving and it is no longer Fiji, NZ and SA who always dominate, although they all got to the last four in Cape Town. For the second tournament in a row the US got to the final and teams like Scotland and Spain put up fine displays. There was plenty of music, but it was not too loud and adapted to the play and intervals. The crowd were great with large numbers in exotic outfits while almost all the rest had Springbok shirts. (Our Swedish outfits were remarked on by a few.) Huge amounts of drink were consumed but we didn´t see a single person the worse for wear. And best of all we are beginning to see more and more intermingling of the various races in the rainbow nation. Whites were predominant in the crowd, but there were plenty of blacks and every shade in between and to see them all cheering like mad when the Boks were doing well was a moving experience. The team at present is of course half and half in colour terms.

Was it worth the trip? Well, not the cheapest night out, but I would say “Yes”.

Of seven´s tournaments I have attended I would rank it alongside 1997 in Hong Kong when Fiji and the great Serewi won a titanic battle against NZ and the Dubai tournament in 2009, both male and female, which convinced the Olympic Committee that rugby should make a comeback.

In a visit to my home town Edinburgh to support the U20s we went with them to the Scotland – South Africa match. It´s years since I´ve been to an international there but my experience of Murrayfield stretches back to the 1950´s. I even scored a try there when playing on the wing for Edinburgh schools against Canada. I was at the game when the mythical South Africans beat Scotland 44 – 0 which with a 5-point try would have been 60 – 0 and also at the game where the SRU admitted 106,000 spectators were present. In actual fact there were 146,000 but there would have been a riot if that figure had been revealed. In these days there was a school pipe-band playing before the game, a senior royal met the teams and elderly stewards escorted spectators to the single stand. In these teetotal days the stewards would also challenge spectators who had smuggled in a hipflask (fickplunta) and eject them from the ground.

Things are a bit different nowadays. Drink is available, the stewards are now young boys and girls who proved incapable of giving any coherent advice about how to find your seats. We climbed about 100 steps, no question of lifts, and found that we were placed just beyond the dead-ball area. This made us almost 100 m. from the centre spot and perhaps 160 metres from the furthest away corner of the pitch. The game started at 5:20 pm, determined of course by the BBC who had scraped together enough to pay for the two cheapest internationals, the other being Wales vs Tonga, and these of course had to be played consecutively. It was dark by the time we were seated with half an hour to go and the floodlighting ranged along the top of the stand also distracted from viewing the actual pitch. Both teams were out by then going through their drills but they were back in the changing rooms with 20 minutes to go. Then all the lights were switched off and the crowd was asked to light up their telephones which many thousands did. I´m told this is done at pop concerts which I last attended 60 years ago when we didn´t even have a telephone at home. Then in pitch darkness the Red Hot Chili Peppers gave a mediocre rendition of the Scottish folk song “Loch Lomond” although they were helped by the whole crowd which sang along lustily. The Proclaimers classic hit was also played while a psychedelic display raged around, interspersed with canons/fireworks exploding at regular intervals. Then, just as we were expecting the Rolling Stones or Justin Bieber to appear, two teams ran on to the pitch and it seemed a rugby game was planned. A poor version of the normally moving South African anthem blared out and then we had “Flower of Scotland” with it seemed all 60,000 of those present belting it out. No royal presentations these days and the game was on.

This was what we had come to see, but for me it was almost impossible. My eyesight is not what it was, but I am told by others around me with better vision that only tiny players could be discerned in the distance. I watched the match on one of the big screens at each end of the ground. But there were further problems. Beer sales mean that spectators are up and down throughout the match to purchase and to relieve themselves. Many stand up every time Scotland approaches the opposition line, quite often on the day, even blocking the big screens. I saw nothing of the Scottish tries and very little of anything else as a screen of bodies appeared every few minutes.

What with a battle to get into the ground and a battle to get out again it took us 4 ½ hours to get back and forward to our hotel about three miles away for the 2×40” game.

And the cost of the tickets? 1.200:- each. Was it worth it? Certainly not. I´m sure the youngsters had a great time, but it would have been better for my wife and I to have bought a small TV for the price of our two tickets and to watch rugby at home for the rest of our natural lives.

After the pretty miserable conditions on a last resort pitch against Stirling University on Wednesday it was a pleasure to arrive at an immaculate Edinburgh University sports ground on a sunny day on Friday. In front of a crowd of over 300 in the stand the teams were piped on to the pitch in brilliant renditions of “Du gamla, Du fria” and “Flower of Scotland”.

The Swedish U20 team was by now down to 18 more or less fit players against a team of 21 students who were around 3 years older, in the middle of their season and without the strain of a match two days before.

Nevertheless, Sweden started off well, put their opponents under pressure, and Liam Pallin ran round the outside to touch down. Mattieu added the points and the visitors had a spring in their stride. Sweden continued to attack but missed three line-outs in a row and within a few minutes the University counter-attacked and were over in the corner. Play moved from end to end for some tine but then the home team turned defense into attack once again and scored an excellent try after interpassing in the backs. The kick went over to make it 12 – 7. There was stalemate for some time in an open flowing game. Sweden had their chances but the home defense was very solid,

On 25”, the Engineers took a penalty to the corner and in a clever move broke away to score in the corner. Then, just on half-time, after intense pressure the home team got their fourth try via a drive over and it was 24 – 7 at the break. This felt a little peculiar as Sweden had had over 50% possession and territory but couldn´t break down the opposition defense.

But worse was to come. Sweden pinned the university in their own half for an unbroken 15”. But then an interception saw a break-out from near the university line. The runner was caught but support was there for them to score on their first outing into the Swedish half.

Ten minutes later they were back in the Swedish half again and another long run saw a try yet again in the corner.

This made it 34 – 7, but the Swedish team didn´t lose heart and were back on the attack once more. And once again an interception near the home team line saw the students sweeping 90 m. up the field to score again with 7” minutes to go. On the final whistle the university made it into the Swedish half for the fourth time and scored yet again to make it 44 – 7.

By my watch, after the break the university engineers were in the Swedish half for 6”, during which time they chalked up four tries! Sweden on the other hand had spent about 25” around the home 22 m. line without getting over the whitewash.

The scoreboard doesn´t lie, but it certainly didn´t reflect what was in fact quite a close game.

The U20s had run out of players by the end and the pack was chopped and changed throughout but still stood up pretty well, although the lineout was shaky. Anthony R. had a good game, judged to be man of the match, while the biggest man on the field, Alasdair M. had a few useful bursts. Theo was hampered by a twisted ankle from Wednesday but was still given the man of the tour award. Olle H. was once again very steady at scrum half. If Sweden had had the 23 players originally chosen for the trip the score would, I think, have been very different today. But these problems have to be surmounted. Over a dozen of the players from the tour will be eligible for the U20s again next year and with the U18s also showing up well this Autumn there should be the makings of a good U20s team for 2019.

All in all, an excellent tour so far, rounded off today with a visit to the Scotland – South Africa game. Congratulations once again to coach and manager Henry van Niekerk and Sean Logan. It is a pleasure to see how a tour of this type should be administered and managed. And congratulations also to the players. A well-behaved, polite and appreciative group of young men.

The newly formed Swedish U20 team put up an impressive display to beat a better than expected Stirling University by four tries to one in a match whose venue was changed twice because of waterlogged pitches. The final pitch was acceptable, although heavy and muddy, and the game was played in an almost continuous drizzle.

Coach Henry van Niekerk had had his fair share of troubles prior to the game with two last minute withdrawals through injury, two players not released by the army and one player not allowed on the plane because his papers were not in order. Finally, he assembled 19 players with a shortage of front row players. Second row moved up to prop and back row to second row, but the forwards were just able to hold their own in the scrums and were ahead in the lineouts.

Stirling started off strongly aided by a slight slope and a following wind but the U20 defence was rock solid. The Swedes came more into the game and showed they could make breaks in the backs. Finally, after 15” Samuel Ekfeldt broke through and ran away to score under the posts. Mattieu Spens converted and a few minutes later a powerful forward drive saw Arvid Peters over for another. 12 – 0 to the visitors but Stirling continued to press and they finally got through to score a converted try on the half-time whistle.

In the second half it was the U20s who had the advantage and a little better timing of the final pass could have given a couple of tries. Stirling held on however although the attacks got closer to their own line. Finally the pack went over again and Anthony Rafael got the touchdown. One last attack by Stirling, but it was comfortably contained and the Swedes worked their way down the field again for Theo Karlsson to force his way over for the final try.

The Swedish defence was outstanding, I don´t think they missed a tackle all afternoon and the handling of both teams was top class considering the conditions. Theo at Nr 8 was a very nasty surprise for the Scottish boys, He burst through several times to make 40 metres with two or three defenders required to stop him. My man of the match. Viggo Pihl had an excellent game as well, despite playing out of position. The backs all ran strongly, as well as chopping down their opponents. Olle Håkansson kept the ball flowing from the base of the scrum while Rasmus Lindquist at stand-off created problems for the Stirling defence. All in all a fine team effort.

Stirling took the game very seriously with both their teams training and warming up before the game. Stirling are not one of the stronger varsity sides but university rugby is making rapid progress in Britain and they were a well-drilled and useful side who were certainly not planning to lose to the inhabitants of the frozen North.

This was a punishing game and we will see how many of our 19 players are still on the field for the Edinburgh University game on Friday. The Edinburgh University team is the best in Scotland. They played a start of season match against St Andrews in September at Murrayfield in front of a crowd of 10.000. This team would probably have been too strong for the U20s, but we will be playing the Engineering faculty which should be about the right level to provide another tough game.

Five of the ten games played in the European North Conference 1, with the remainder to be played in the Spring of 2019.

After two games each Sweden and Ukraine have 9 points, Hungary 5, Luxembourg 1 and Moldavia 0.

Sweden has still to play Hungary and Ukraine; Ukraine plays Moldova and Sweden; Hungary plays Sweden and Luxembourg; Luxembourg plays Moldova and Hungary, while Moldavia plays Luxembourg and Ukraine.

Sweden´s strengths and weaknesses have been dealt with earlier. I´ve watched all the games and none of the teams have been particularly convincing. Ukraine are ranked 35 and should be the strongest team in the group. Yet in 2017 they only drew with Hungary and were well beaten by Lithuania who were then promoted. This year they were initially in command against Luxembourg but faded at the start of the second half and the match was in the balance, 17 – 13, for some time. Their strong pack pulled them through and they got a try late on to make it 24 – 13. In their second game, they also looked like running away with it, leading 30 – 10 at half time. But once again they seemed to fade, letting Hungary back into the game with a final score of 48 – 24.

Sweden started off with the rout of an appalling Moldavian team who conceded 49 points in 17 minutes in the second half. In their second game against Luxembourg Sweden just had the edge but could easily have lost to a final easy penalty which just sailed by.

The final game saw Moldavia face Hungary. The match was moved to a small town outside the capital and was played on the worst, badly marked, pitch I have ever seen in European rugby. Moldavia had retained nine of the starters against Sweden, had improved slightly, but were still a very poor team. The crowd was no more than a few dozen. This was Hungary´s first game and they were not impressive, far poorer than the year before. They conceded a try in the first minute and struggled to win 31 – 16, although their victory was never in doubt.

Summing up, Sweden a little better than the year before, but still nothing like a complete side. Ukraine with a strong pack who seem to go off the boil in the second half. Nothing like the team of yesteryear, Luxembourg improving, playing better against Ukraine than against Sweden. Hungary definitely weaker than the year before but can still put together some good scoring moves. Moldova a sad story with several fine forwards playing at top level in Western Europe. Unless they all rally to the cause, they will lose away to Luxembourg and be relegated ending up among the lesser northern European teams. Ukraine will take 5 points off Moldavia while Sweden should also win their first game in the Spring, although it depends on which Hungarian team turns up. This should give a promotion decider in May with Sweden travelling to the Ukraine. This will be the most important rugby game for Sweden in 2019 and I would call upon the Union to start planning for this immediately. Anything less than the best trained, selected and coached Swedish team will not be good enough to beat a Ukrainian team at home, who also have all to play for.

I can´t say I´ve been a great fan of even more Swedish national teams being formed to represent the country abroad. With U18s, males, females, 7s and 15s all clamouring for a role in representing Sweden it is easy to see why the Union is wary about financing a further age group, U20.

There are, unfortunately, no U20 leagues or tournaments in Sweden and this I think should be a requirement before any teams are sent abroad. In this case there are, however, a number of factors which suggest that this U20 team should be supported.

The U20 age group is growing in importance internationally at the expense of U18. It is important to test our strength at this level.

Almost all the players are based in Sweden and are playing regularly in various leagues. All five of the Exiles players have played at least the odd game for the Swedish champions (I´m still counting Jonathan Craenen as an Exiles player although he´s now studying in Belgium) and at least five more play regularly for other Allsvenska clubs. In fact I think half a dozen of the young men have been selected for national senior squads and three of them have in fact already played for Sweden.

I don´t know all of the players from the smaller clubs but this seems close to be the best we can put together, apart from perhaps a couple of players from Pingvin. As has been mentioned the team has congregated three times and put up not a bad show at the Stockholm Tens.

Their coach, Henry van Niekerk, has first as assistant and then as senior coach led Exiles to their last five Swedish titles and in doing so has built up a coaching competence which deserves recognition at a higher level.

In short, let´s see how they get on against not the strongest of opposition.

University rugby in Scotland has in the past been at a modest level but in recent years there has been a big improvement. Stirling are not among the best while Edinburgh are the current champions. In the latter case, Sweden will I think be playing one of the larger faculties, engineering.

I can´t really assess the strength of the opposition in advance, but I will stick my neck out and state that we should win both matches. Defeats would suggest that we have more to work on at this level.

I will be attending both matches and expect to file match reports on the Exiles home page.

When money as always is short, my family has said that we are prepared to give financial support to the Union when teams are well prepared, the best Swedish players are chosen, and the teams are well coached and managed. We consider this to be the case with the present U20 team.

I have had another look at the game against Luxembourg yesterday and have a few final thoughts. Sweden could easily have lost of course if the final penalty had just drifted inside the post instead of just outside. But I think on balance Sweden did just about enough to win. Their attack was a bit sharper and, apart from a burst just before the interval, Luxembourg never really looked like challenging the Swedish line. In fact, Sweden haven´t conceded a try in the two games so far, which is always a plus.

The backs were better this week than against Moldova, with a much lower error rate, but the off-loading still needs to be improved. The two centres and Arnold on the wing were threatening and the oldest brother Murphy created gaps when coming into the line from fullback. My main complaints when it comes to the backs are that there are four or five scrum halves in Sweden who offer more than the young lad from Södertälje. Once Fredrik Enstad moved to his best position the threat from the Swedish backs increased dramatically. I also feel that Philip Murphy has a bit to go at standoff. He makes half-breaks, stops and is not terribly good at offloading. Once again there is one far better player in Sweden.

Turning to the forwards, I think it is an insult to Swedish sport to have three obviously overweight players in the starting line-up. They seldom contribute in the rucks and mauls, especially towards the end of the game, and end up in the backs where they slow the other real backs down without ever making more than two or three metres, if they don´t drop the ball. This is very poor selection indeed.

On the positive side I think Arthur Marini had his best game for Sweden. He took 7 or 8 lineouts and disrupted a couple of Luxembourg throw-ins, as well as getting about the field. Theo Karlsson was his usual dynamic self and the Luxembourg scrum started going backwards when he moved up to the front row. Giga has had a quiet start to his international career but in the last 20 minutes yesterday he began to flex his muscles and showed up well in attack and defence. Not bad for a refugee after three years in the country!

It´s sad to think how much stronger we could be with the 7 – 8 reinforcements who are available. A whole squad of them are off to play in the Dubai Sevens in a few week times with several international select teams. I think we would have a chance against Ukraine in the Spring if they were included in the Swedish team, but I doubt if we can make promotion with the present squad.

Sverige hade 23 spelare i truppen mot Moldovien (80 – 6). Mot Luxembourg i morgon presenteras en trupp om 21 spelare. Fem spelare har försvunnit från den första truppen och tre har tillkommit.

De som lämnat är Sami Paulsson (Exiles), flanker; Conor Murphy (Landsdowne), uthalv; Nils Holmgren (Uppsala), nr 8; Jonas Zengler (Trojan), tredje/andra led; Sebastian Pihlainen (Hammarby) ytter. Fyra av dessa kan vi nog leva utan, men Sami är en enorm förlust, han var ju Sveriges bäste spelare mot Moldavien. Jag vet inte om det är jobb eller skada som är problemet, men det är en klar försvagning att han inte är med.

De som tillkommit är Alfred Nordgren (Malmö), kedja; Jan-Olof Johansson (Spartacus), kratsare; Antoine Coopoosamy (Exiles), ytter. Alfred är en klar förstärkning, men det kan man knappast säga om de två andra. 34-åringen Johansson har spelat 4 – 5 matcher för Spartacus i Div. 2 i år och Antoine är en bra klubbspelare som dock inte platsar i Exiles bästa 23. Av Exiles 12 serie- och slutspelsmatcher startade han i fyra och var på bänken i två.

De som startar mot Luxembourg blir något svagare p g a Samis frånvaro och jag vill påminna som vanligt om att truppen av okänd anledning saknar 8 – 10 av Sveriges bästa spelare.

Luxembourg spelade bra mot Ukraina (13 – 24) för ett par veckor sedan och är bättre än på länge. Jag är inte helt säker på att Sverige vinner; det kan bli en tuff och jämn match. Men vi ställer upp med ett lag som inte rimligtvis kan aspirera på Trophy-nivån nästa år.

Skall också bli intressant att se hur Moldavien klarar sig mot Ungern i morgon. Ungern var en frisk fläkt förra året och kan inte Moldavien skärpa sig kan det bli en ny storförlust. Flera av deras bästa klungaspelare spelar dock numera på hög nivå i Väst. Matchen streamas inte, viket är illavarslande, och det står inte en rad om den på Moldaviens hemsida.

Åren går och plötsligt har nykomlingarna fyllt 50 år! När Exiles började spela 1964 var svensk rugby ett ganska litet sällskap. Motståndarna var Attila, Älvsjö, Troján, Malmö och Pingvin. Men inom några år var det flera nya som tillkom: Göteborg, Vänersborg, Uppsala, Enköping och Spartacus och rugby började få något slags rikstäckning. På 60-talet var det Malmö som dominerade med 5 SM, deras senaste (sista?) 1967. Attila stack upp 2 gånger, även här kanske för sista gången 1968, medan Exiles och nykomlingen Uppsala (med f.d. Exile Tony de Belder i spetsen) tog en titel vardera.

I början på 70-talet tog Uppsala och Exiles sina andra SM, tillsammans med ytterligare en nykomling, Vänersborg.

Men fr o m 1973 blev det Enköping som dominerade svensk rugby i nästan två årtionden. Under perioden fram till 1990 vann de 16 av 18 titlar med endast Uppsala (1977) och Exiles (1989) som avbröt sviten. Med 11 i rad (1978 – 1988) som längsta serien. Under långa perioder var de t o m obesegrade och det var snack om att de skulle behöva söka sig utomlands för att få något motstånd. Intressant att notera var att nästan alla spelare kom från Enköpingstrakten och att de inte sällan hade ett halvt dussin juniorer i laguppställningen. Det är alltid svårt att jämföra spelargenerationer men jag tror nog att de som varit med länge skulle placera Kari Tapper, Niklas Jaråker, Jonas Toresäter och Mats Asp bland sina bästa svenska spelare genom tiderna.

Ingenting varar för evigt i idrottssammanhang och så har det också varit för Enköping. Pingvin dominerade som bekant under 90-talet med 10 titlar i rad, fast flera av dem vanns med ett nödrop. Efter sekelskiftet har det varit Exiles som varit det ledande herrlaget med 18 SM-finaler i rad och 12 titlar, men det skulle förvåna om de kan upprepa Enköpings bedrift från 70- och 80-talen.

Av de sex finaler som Exiles förlorat på 2000-talet var det Enköping som stod för fyra av dessa. Men det har varit 7 år sedan sist och även om de tog bronset i år skall jag vara snäll och låta bli att nämna med hur mycket de förlorade mot Exiles några veckor innan. Än en gång har de dock ett ungt och lovande lag och vi får hoppas att de med åren blir starkare. Svensk rugby behöver ett konkurrenskraftigt Enköping. Deras damlag har också till och från varit bland de bättre och kan hittills stoltsera med fem titlar.

20 SM till herrarna och 5 till damerna ger 25 vuxna SM, en strålande prestation och även om Exiles håller på att hinna ikapp (15 herr-SM och 10 dam-SM) får vi än så länge tilldela Enköping titeln ”Sveriges bästa rugbyklubb genom tiderna”. Gratulerar på födelsedagen!